<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gay Marriage; What&#8217;s The Big Deal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ttmitchellconsulting.com/Mitchblog/gay-marriage-whats-the-big-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ttmitchellconsulting.com/Mitchblog/gay-marriage-whats-the-big-deal/</link>
	<description>Management, Leadership, Diversity, Customer Service, Motivation, and Healthcare Finance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:37:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.ttmitchellconsulting.com/Mitchblog/gay-marriage-whats-the-big-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-15698</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 01:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ttmitchellconsulting.com/Mitchblog/?p=616#comment-15698</guid>
		<description>Hey Xero.  I&#039;ve always wondered about the term &quot;gay agenda&quot; myself, as if gays were a monolith of one belief.  Goodness, there are conservative gay people, so where&#039;s the agenda?

As for the other, I hope it&#039;s a momentary stumble also.  Based on his full record, I don&#039;t have any worries that he supports some of the things Warren has said.  I&#039;m sure he had a good reason for it, but if I&#039;d had to make the choice, I know I&#039;d have gone a totally different way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:left; margin-right:10px; display:block; width:40px' ><a rel='external' href='http://www.ttmitchellconsulting.com'><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/f5814208eb949d1d50e2f81b42ff36c1?s=40&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fuse.perl.org%2Fimages%2Fpix.gif%3Fs%3D40&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-40 photo' height='40' width='40' /></a></span>Hey Xero.  I&#8217;ve always wondered about the term &#8220;gay agenda&#8221; myself, as if gays were a monolith of one belief.  Goodness, there are conservative gay people, so where&#8217;s the agenda?</p>
<p>As for the other, I hope it&#8217;s a momentary stumble also.  Based on his full record, I don&#8217;t have any worries that he supports some of the things Warren has said.  I&#8217;m sure he had a good reason for it, but if I&#8217;d had to make the choice, I know I&#8217;d have gone a totally different way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xero</title>
		<link>http://www.ttmitchellconsulting.com/Mitchblog/gay-marriage-whats-the-big-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-15696</link>
		<dc:creator>Xero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ttmitchellconsulting.com/Mitchblog/?p=616#comment-15696</guid>
		<description>I always cringe when some right-leaning opinionist starts in about the GAY AGENDA.  So in the hopes of setting the record straight, here is the gay agenda, boiled down to two words: EQUAL RIGHTS.  Not special rights.  Not &quot;Separate, but equal.&quot;  Equal.  Nothing more, nothing less.  Shocking, isn&#039;t it?  Expecting to be treated like everyone else in my community!  In the United States, no less!  

As for Obama picking Rick Warren for the invocation: what was he thinking?  Was he trying to placate those who didn&#039;t vote for him?  Is he looking to balance everyone&#039;s stance, and in the end, sending a questionable mixed message?  I am hoping that this was just a small stumble for him, and that he&#039;ll be a little more careful when inviting controversial figures onto center stage.  I bought into Obama&#039;s promises of &quot;hope&quot; and &quot;change&quot;  Preacher Warren is neither.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:left; margin-right:10px; display:block; width:40px' ><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/97b2466c8900b182e6f3454548c3a1ce?s=40&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fuse.perl.org%2Fimages%2Fpix.gif%3Fs%3D40&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-40 photo' height='40' width='40' /></span>I always cringe when some right-leaning opinionist starts in about the GAY AGENDA.  So in the hopes of setting the record straight, here is the gay agenda, boiled down to two words: EQUAL RIGHTS.  Not special rights.  Not &#8220;Separate, but equal.&#8221;  Equal.  Nothing more, nothing less.  Shocking, isn&#8217;t it?  Expecting to be treated like everyone else in my community!  In the United States, no less!  </p>
<p>As for Obama picking Rick Warren for the invocation: what was he thinking?  Was he trying to placate those who didn&#8217;t vote for him?  Is he looking to balance everyone&#8217;s stance, and in the end, sending a questionable mixed message?  I am hoping that this was just a small stumble for him, and that he&#8217;ll be a little more careful when inviting controversial figures onto center stage.  I bought into Obama&#8217;s promises of &#8220;hope&#8221; and &#8220;change&#8221;  Preacher Warren is neither.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

